Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from Lithuania
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from Lithuania
11.0%
DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,638,436 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,724,932 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.4%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from Lithuania |
Minimum | 4.2% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 31.0% | 17.7% |
Range | 26.8% | 15.5% |
Mean | 12.5% | 10.9% |
Median | 10.4% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 11.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Lithuania by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Bangladesh (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Serbia (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Lebanon (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from France (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Sri Lankan (11.0%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from El Salvador (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Jordanian (10.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Salvadoran (10.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from South America (10.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Colombia (10.9%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bulgarians | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Sri Lankans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | France | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.0% |