Immigrants from Central America vs Moroccan Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Central America
Moroccan
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Central America
Moroccans
12.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
67.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
72.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Central America vs Moroccan Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 536,290,679 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,802,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 0.24%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Central America | Moroccan |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 41.7% | 31.6% |
| Range | 39.9% | 27.0% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 14.0% |
| Median | 11.7% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Central America and Moroccans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Immigrants from Guatemala (12.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Guyanese (12.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Guatemalan (12.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Czech (12.1%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Danish (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Ghanaian (12.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Syrian (12.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (12.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Nigerians | 84.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 83.1 /100 | #148 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Greeks | 82.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 81.4 /100 | #150 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Icelanders | 80.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 79.3 /100 | #152 | Good 12.0% |
| Sudanese | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.0% |
| Syrians | 76.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Ghanaians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.1% |
| Moroccans | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 12.1% |
| Danes | 72.5 /100 | #157 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 72.4 /100 | #158 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 67.7 /100 | #159 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 66.0 /100 | #160 | Good 12.1% |
| Guyanese | 64.7 /100 | #161 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 64.3 /100 | #162 | Good 12.1% |
| Guatemalans | 63.8 /100 | #163 | Good 12.1% |
| Czechs | 63.6 /100 | #164 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 61.8 /100 | #165 | Good 12.1% |
| Lithuanians | 59.5 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 59.0 /100 | #167 | Average 12.2% |