Immigrants from Canada vs Scandinavian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Canada
Scandinavian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Canada
Scandinavians
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
44.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Canada vs Scandinavian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,245,879 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.680 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,401,593 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.29%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Canada | Scandinavian |
Minimum | 0.55% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 64.0% | 24.6% |
Range | 63.4% | 22.7% |
Mean | 12.2% | 8.4% |
Median | 8.8% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 10.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Canada and Scandinavians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Croatian (6.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Moroccan (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Vietnamese (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (6.1%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from England (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North America (6.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |