Immigrants from Belize vs Ethiopian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belize
Ethiopian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belize
Ethiopians
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belize vs Ethiopian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,272,611 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belize and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,190,203 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belize | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.17% |
| Maximum | 14.3% | 9.9% |
| Range | 13.2% | 9.7% |
| Mean | 3.4% | 2.5% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 0.70% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belize and Ethiopians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belize are Immigrants from Nepal (2.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (2.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Egyptian (2.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Indian (Asian) (2.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (2.7%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (2.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (2.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Jamaican (2.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and South American (2.7%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Paraguayans | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Jamaicans | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Nicaraguans | 97.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Peruvians | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.7% |