Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Cherokee
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Cherokee
11.8%
FEMALE DISABILITY
97.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,193,098 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,548,902 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 14.9%, a difference of 26.4%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 28.7% | 57.1% |
| Range | 27.2% | 54.6% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 20.9% |
| Median | 11.5% | 20.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 23.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Bangladesh (11.8%, a difference of 0.010%), South African (11.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (11.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Morocco (11.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Costa Rican (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Greece | 98.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Latvians | 98.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| New Zealanders | 98.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 98.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Soviet Union | 98.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 98.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 97.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 97.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| South Africans | 97.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Brazilians | 97.7 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.6 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 97.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 97.2 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 97.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Cajun (14.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Pima (14.8%, a difference of 0.48%), Seminole (15.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and Tohono O'odham (15.0%, a difference of 0.82%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |