Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Japanese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Japanese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Japanese
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
24.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Japanese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,637,177 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,121,214 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Japanese |
Minimum | 0.46% | 0.93% |
Maximum | 15.9% | 18.5% |
Range | 15.4% | 17.6% |
Mean | 6.1% | 7.5% |
Median | 5.9% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh and Japanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Italian (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |