Immigrants from Australia vs Taiwanese Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Taiwanese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Taiwanese
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Taiwanese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,117,952 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.639 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,721,885 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 1.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Taiwanese |
| Minimum | 0.16% | 0.15% |
| Maximum | 12.7% | 4.0% |
| Range | 12.6% | 3.9% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 1.8% |
| Median | 2.1% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 0.75% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 0.74% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia and Taiwanese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Turkey (1.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Egypt (1.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.35%), Luxembourger (1.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and Bhutanese (2.0%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Immigrants from Malaysia (1.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Egyptian (1.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Nepal (1.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Mongolian (1.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Japan (1.9%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |