Immigrants from Asia vs Sierra Leonean Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Asia
Sierra Leonean
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Asia
Sierra Leoneans
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Asia vs Sierra Leonean Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,490,821 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,322,147 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.139 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.60%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Asia | Sierra Leonean |
Minimum | 0.037% | 0.96% |
Maximum | 25.8% | 4.5% |
Range | 25.8% | 3.5% |
Mean | 2.6% | 2.2% |
Median | 2.3% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.44% | 0.60% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 0.65% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 0.64% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Asia and Sierra Leoneans by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Macedonian (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Chile (2.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Swiss (2.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Poland (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Lithuanian (2.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Congo (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Estonian (2.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Poland | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 96.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Europeans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.4% |