Immigrants from Asia vs Bhutanese Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Asia
Bhutanese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Asia
Bhutanese
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Asia vs Bhutanese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,864,164 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.442 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,984,678 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 2.2%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Asia | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.11% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 4.3% | 5.1% |
| Range | 4.2% | 4.6% |
| Mean | 1.7% | 2.0% |
| Median | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.8% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.32% | 0.74% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.51% | 0.77% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.51% | 0.76% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Asia and Bhutanese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Immigrants from Lithuania (1.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Bulgarian (1.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Japan (1.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Pakistan (1.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and Taiwanese (1.9%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Kuwait (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Zimbabwean (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Ireland (2.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Australia (1.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |