Houma vs Tsimshian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Houma
Tsimshian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Houma
Tsimshian
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Tsimshian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,798,453 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.743 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080 and weighted average of 4.7%, a difference of 11.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 11.9% | 15.4% |
| Range | 9.5% | 12.3% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 7.9% |
| Median | 5.1% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Houma and Tsimshian by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Dutch West Indian (4.3%, a difference of 0.59%), Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 0.68%), Native/Alaskan (4.2%, a difference of 0.83%), Aleut (4.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and Crow (4.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Navajo (4.6%, a difference of 1.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Tlingit-Haida (4.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 5.8% |