Greek vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Greek
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Greeks
Immigrants from Costa Rica
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
79.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,531,888 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.622 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,267,937 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Greek | Immigrants from Costa Rica |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 14.6% |
| Range | 48.5% | 13.0% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 5.7% |
| Median | 8.0% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Greeks and Immigrants from Costa Rica by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Maltese (6.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Lithuanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.35%), Ute (6.0%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |