German vs Tlingit-Haida Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
German
Tlingit-Haida
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Germans
Tlingit-Haida
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
German vs Tlingit-Haida Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,433,029 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Germans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,848,336 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 0.040%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | German | Tlingit-Haida |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 23.7% | 25.7% |
| Range | 22.0% | 24.0% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 8.0% |
| Median | 6.3% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.93% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Germans and Tlingit-Haida by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Germans are Immigrants from Panama (6.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Spaniard (6.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Haiti (6.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Armenian (6.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Armenian (6.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Panama (6.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Spaniard (6.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Haiti (6.5%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Haitians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Senegalese | 1.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 1.6 /100 | #241 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Spaniards | 1.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Germans | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.5% |