French vs Pennsylvania German Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
French
Pennsylvania German
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
French
Pennsylvania Germans
6.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French vs Pennsylvania German Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 571,874,701 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,073,505 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 6.8%, a difference of 1.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | French | Pennsylvania German |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 47.5% | 36.5% |
| Range | 45.4% | 35.4% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 7.5% |
| Median | 8.0% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to French and Pennsylvania Germans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to French are Slovak (6.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Spanish (6.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (6.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and Guyanese (6.6%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Yaqui (6.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Caribbean (6.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Barbadian (6.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from West Indies (6.7%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Nepalese | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Spanish | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.6% |
| French | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.7% |
| French Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Sioux | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.8% |