French Canadian vs Nonimmigrants Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
French Canadian
Nonimmigrants
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
French Canadians
Nonimmigrants
6.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French Canadian vs Nonimmigrants Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,380,239 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 6.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 584,325,810 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 2.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | French Canadian | Nonimmigrants |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 32.4% | 20.4% |
Range | 30.5% | 18.8% |
Mean | 9.0% | 6.1% |
Median | 7.4% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 6.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 0.88% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to French Canadians and Nonimmigrants by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are White/Caucasian (6.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Sioux (6.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Celtic (6.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.7%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Immigrants from Dominica (6.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Scotch-Irish (6.9%, a difference of 0.17%), U.S. Virgin Islander (6.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Yakama (6.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and Fijian (6.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Slovaks | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.7% |
French Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.7% |
Sioux | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.7% |
Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.8% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.8% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.8% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.9% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.9% |