Finnish vs Mexican American Indian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Finnish
Mexican American Indian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Finns
Mexican American Indians
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
17.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Finnish vs Mexican American Indian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,562,886 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,517,841 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.55%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Finnish | Mexican American Indian |
| Minimum | 0.58% | 0.46% |
| Maximum | 27.6% | 19.4% |
| Range | 27.1% | 18.9% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 7.6% |
| Median | 7.2% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Finns and Mexican American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Alsatian (6.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |