Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Poland Male Disability
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Immigrants from Poland
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Ecuadorians
Immigrants from Poland
10.5%
MALE DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
MALE DISABILITY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Poland Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,801,764 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,827,487 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.613 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 1.2%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Poland |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 19.6% | 61.1% |
| Range | 17.0% | 57.5% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 14.8% |
| Median | 9.5% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Immigrants from Poland by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Colombian (10.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Guyanese (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (10.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (10.5%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Bulgarian (10.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guyana (10.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Chile (10.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Jordan (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Sri Lankan (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Guyanese | 99.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Colombians | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 98.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 98.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 98.1 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Bulgarians | 98.1 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Sri Lankans | 97.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 97.9 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.6% |