Czech vs Hmong Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Czech
Hmong
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Czechs
Hmong
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Hmong Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,559,350 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.203 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,680,511 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 3.4%, a difference of 2.6%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Hmong |
Minimum | 0.98% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 13.6% | 8.3% |
Range | 12.6% | 6.5% |
Mean | 4.9% | 3.7% |
Median | 4.3% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 2.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 4.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Hmong by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are European (3.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Ute (3.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Spaniard (3.5%, a difference of 0.92%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Polish (3.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Slavic (3.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Yaqui (3.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Northern European (3.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and Carpatho Rusyn (3.4%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Carpatho Rusyns | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 3.4% |
Slavs | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 3.4% |
Poles | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 3.4% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 3.4% |
Yaqui | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 3.4% |
Northern Europeans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 3.4% |
Slovenes | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 3.5% |
Portuguese | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 3.5% |
Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 3.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 3.5% |
Immigrants | Canada | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 3.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 3.5% |
British | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.5% |
Belgians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.5% |
Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% |
Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |