Croatian vs Immigrants from Latvia Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Croatian
Immigrants from Latvia
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Croatians
Immigrants from Latvia
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
51.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
71.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Immigrants from Latvia Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,651,055 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,736,193 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.678 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Croatian | Immigrants from Latvia |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.16% |
Maximum | 32.1% | 28.4% |
Range | 30.6% | 28.2% |
Mean | 8.8% | 7.4% |
Median | 7.4% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 8.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Immigrants from Latvia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Canada (6.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Moroccan (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ecuador (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Vietnamese (6.1%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |