Chinese vs White/Caucasian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
White/Caucasian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Chinese
Whites/Caucasians
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs White/Caucasian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,631 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 582,250,050 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.831 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 0.13%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 0.63% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 11.0% | 5.7% |
Range | 10.4% | 3.6% |
Mean | 4.4% | 3.2% |
Median | 3.9% | 3.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 3.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 0.77% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 0.77% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Whites/Caucasians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Finnish (3.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Irish (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Finnish (3.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Irish (3.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |