Chinese vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Vision Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Northern Africa
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,588 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,057,261 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.038 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 1.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Minimum | 0.40% | 0.14% |
Maximum | 6.4% | 5.0% |
Range | 6.0% | 4.8% |
Mean | 2.3% | 1.9% |
Median | 2.1% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.78% | 0.61% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 0.84% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.00% | 0.83% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Immigrants from Northern Africa by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Moldova (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Western Asia (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Poland (2.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and Soviet Union (2.0%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Argentina (2.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (2.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (2.0%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Russians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | France | 98.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Palestinians | 98.3 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Paraguayans | 98.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Lithuanians | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Soviet Union | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.0% |