Chinese vs Bhutanese Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Chinese
Bhutanese
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Chinese
Bhutanese
21.7%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.5%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Bhutanese Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,752,265 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 21.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,236,804 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.016 and weighted average of 21.5%, a difference of 0.99%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 6.7% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 63.7% | 46.7% |
Range | 57.1% | 37.1% |
Mean | 23.6% | 21.5% |
Median | 21.4% | 20.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.8% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.3% | 24.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Bhutanese by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Egypt (21.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Belarus (21.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Scotland (21.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (21.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Maltese (21.6%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from France (21.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Italy (21.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Romania (21.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Denmark (21.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Asia (21.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 21.4% |
Immigrants | France | 99.6 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 21.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 21.5% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.6 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 21.5% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 21.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 99.5 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 21.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.5 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 21.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.5 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 21.5% |
Zimbabweans | 99.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 21.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 21.6% |
Egyptians | 99.5 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 21.6% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.5 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 21.6% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 21.6% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 21.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 21.6% |
Maltese | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 21.6% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 21.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 21.7% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 21.7% |
Chinese | 99.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 21.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 21.7% |