Chilean vs Lithuanian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Chilean
Lithuanian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Chileans
Lithuanians
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Lithuanian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,527,062 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,348,071 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.67%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 0.69% | 0.63% |
Maximum | 4.7% | 13.3% |
Range | 4.0% | 12.7% |
Mean | 2.2% | 3.3% |
Median | 2.2% | 2.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.57% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.79% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.78% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Lithuanians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Ugandan (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Denmark (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Indian (Asian) (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Spain (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Sierra Leonean (2.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Congo (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Estonian (2.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | China | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.0 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chileans | 98.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |