Cherokee vs Chickasaw Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Cherokee
Chickasaw
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Cherokee
Chickasaw
2.9%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Chickasaw Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,732,584 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.358 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,605,375 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.058 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.70%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.97% | 0.38% |
Maximum | 15.5% | 11.8% |
Range | 14.5% | 11.4% |
Mean | 4.4% | 3.9% |
Median | 3.8% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 4.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Chickasaw by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Seminole (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Comanche (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (2.9%, a difference of 0.53%), Navajo (2.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and Spanish American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.91%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Navajo (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Spanish American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (2.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Dominica (2.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Comanche (2.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 2.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 2.8% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 2.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 2.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 2.8% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 2.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 2.8% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 2.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 2.9% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 2.9% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 2.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 2.9% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 2.9% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 2.9% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 2.9% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 2.9% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 2.9% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.0% |