Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Immigrants from Oceania
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Central American Indians
Immigrants from Oceania
7.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,071,152 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.616 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,408,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 17.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 32.9% | 20.2% |
| Range | 30.3% | 18.6% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 8.5% |
| Median | 7.4% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 4.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (7.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Ottawa (7.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Shoshone (7.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Blackfeet (7.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Yemen (7.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |