Burmese vs Immigrants from Ireland Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Burmese
Immigrants from Ireland
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Burmese
Immigrants from Ireland
9.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Immigrants from Ireland Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,803,120 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 9.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,729,151 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 3.5%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Immigrants from Ireland |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 28.6% |
Range | 36.5% | 26.8% |
Mean | 7.9% | 9.7% |
Median | 6.8% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.2% | 11.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Immigrants from Ireland by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Soviet Union (9.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Venezuela (9.3%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Argentina (9.3%, a difference of 1.2%), Okinawan (9.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and Cypriot (9.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Immigrants from Japan (9.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Pakistan (9.5%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.6%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Asia (9.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.84%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Soviet Union | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Argentineans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |