Burmese vs Crow Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Burmese
Crow
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Burmese
Crow
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Crow Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,101,003 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,204,118 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.303 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 30.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Crow |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 23.5% | 20.2% |
| Range | 22.5% | 15.8% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 8.4% |
| Median | 4.7% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Crow by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Cape Verdean (6.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Alaskan Athabascan (6.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (6.9%, a difference of 0.26%), French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.9% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |