British West Indian vs Sierra Leonean Hearing Disability
COMPARE
British West Indian
Sierra Leonean
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
British West Indians
Sierra Leoneans
2.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Sierra Leonean Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,668,246 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.135 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,339,030 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.429 and weighted average of 2.5%, a difference of 2.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | British West Indian | Sierra Leonean |
Minimum | 0.70% | 0.31% |
Maximum | 6.7% | 4.8% |
Range | 6.0% | 4.5% |
Mean | 2.6% | 2.4% |
Median | 2.7% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 2.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.87% | 0.89% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.90% | 0.86% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.89% | 0.85% |
Demographics Similar to British West Indians and Sierra Leoneans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Bangladesh (2.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (2.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Vietnamese (2.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Immigrants from Ecuador (2.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (2.5%, a difference of 2.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Ecuadorian (2.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (2.5%, a difference of 0.53%), Barbadian (2.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and Immigrants from West Indies (2.5%, a difference of 0.77%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Grenada | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Guyanese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Vietnamese | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 2.4% |
British West Indians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Dominicans | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Thais | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.5% |