British vs Mexican American Indian Female Disability
COMPARE
British
Mexican American Indian
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
British
Mexican American Indians
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
12.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
24.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Mexican American Indian Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,338,456 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,566,879 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 0.77%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British | Mexican American Indian |
| Minimum | 6.2% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 35.6% |
| Range | 93.8% | 33.3% |
| Mean | 25.6% | 14.0% |
| Median | 16.2% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.1% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.9% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to British and Mexican American Indians by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to British are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Samoan (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Ute (12.4%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Honduran (12.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Chinese (12.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Somali (12.3%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Hondurans | 25.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 12.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 24.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 24.7 /100 | #199 | Fair 12.3% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 22.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 12.3% |
| Chinese | 22.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 12.3% |
| Somalis | 21.5 /100 | #202 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 21.1 /100 | #203 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 20.9 /100 | #204 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 20.5 /100 | #205 | Fair 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 12.4% |
| Croatians | 20.2 /100 | #207 | Fair 12.4% |
| Basques | 17.5 /100 | #208 | Poor 12.4% |
| Mexicans | 15.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 12.4% |
| Swiss | 14.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 14.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.4% |
| Ute | 14.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 12.4% |
| Panamanians | 13.5 /100 | #214 | Poor 12.4% |
| Samoans | 13.4 /100 | #215 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 13.3 /100 | #216 | Poor 12.4% |
| British | 12.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 12.4% |