Brazilian vs Tsimshian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Brazilian
Tsimshian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Brazilians
Tsimshian
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
78.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.3%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
49.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Tsimshian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,952,153 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.464 and weighted average of 17.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.021 and weighted average of 17.3%, a difference of 0.96%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 5.1% | 8.4% |
| Maximum | 21.7% | 20.1% |
| Range | 16.6% | 11.8% |
| Mean | 15.9% | 15.6% |
| Median | 16.3% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.5% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Tsimshian by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Sri Lankan (17.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Celtic (17.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Immigrants from Northern Africa (17.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Laotian (17.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (17.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Ecuadorian (17.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Tlingit-Haida (17.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
| Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169 | Good 17.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 59.6 /100 | #170 | Average 17.2% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 59.4 /100 | #171 | Average 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 56.7 /100 | #172 | Average 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 50.2 /100 | #173 | Average 17.3% |
| Laotians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 17.3% |
| Tsimshian | 49.8 /100 | #175 | Average 17.3% |