Brazilian vs Immigrants from Sudan Disability
COMPARE
Brazilian
Immigrants from Sudan
Disability
Disability Comparison
Brazilians
Immigrants from Sudan
11.4%
DISABILITY
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
DISABILITY
85.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Sudan Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,954,129 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,962,854 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 1.0%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | Immigrants from Sudan |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.75% |
Maximum | 23.5% | 20.9% |
Range | 21.8% | 20.1% |
Mean | 11.9% | 11.2% |
Median | 11.3% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 12.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Immigrants from Sudan by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are South African (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), South American Indian (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Costa Rican (11.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Latvia (11.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Italy (11.4%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Immigrants from Grenada (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Russian (11.5%, a difference of 0.14%), New Zealander (11.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Ghanaian (11.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Kenyan (11.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Brazilians | 93.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South Africans | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South American Indians | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Italy | 90.4 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 90.4 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Macedonians | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 89.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 89.8 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 89.3 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.4% |
Arabs | 89.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 88.3 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.4% |
Ugandans | 87.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 87.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.4% |
Kenyans | 87.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.5% |
Ghanaians | 87.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.5% |
Russians | 86.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.5% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 86.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 85.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.5% |