Brazilian vs Immigrants from Africa Male Disability
COMPARE
Brazilian
Immigrants from Africa
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Brazilians
Immigrants from Africa
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
85.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
89.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Africa Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,937,131 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,296,283 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.52%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Immigrants from Africa |
| Minimum | 4.9% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 30.6% | 26.3% |
| Range | 25.7% | 23.9% |
| Mean | 12.0% | 11.0% |
| Median | 11.0% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Immigrants from Africa by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cuba (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Armenian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |