Bhutanese vs Ethiopian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Ethiopian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Bhutanese
Ethiopians
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Ethiopian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,984,678 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,170,588 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.465 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 0.59%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Ethiopian |
Minimum | 0.49% | 0.17% |
Maximum | 5.1% | 3.5% |
Range | 4.6% | 3.3% |
Mean | 2.0% | 1.7% |
Median | 1.8% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 2.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.74% | 0.62% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.77% | 0.65% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.76% | 0.64% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Ethiopians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Kuwait (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Zimbabwean (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Ireland (2.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Cypriot (2.0%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Indonesia (2.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sweden (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Eastern European (2.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |