Bermudan vs Immigrants from Oceania Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Bermudan
Immigrants from Oceania
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Bermudans
Immigrants from Oceania
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bermudan vs Immigrants from Oceania Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,720,149 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,402,457 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 10.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bermudan | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 0.95% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 11.7% | 7.9% |
| Range | 10.7% | 6.5% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 4.0% |
| Median | 3.0% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 1.6% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Bermudans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |