Barbadian vs Spanish American Indian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Barbadian
Spanish American Indian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Barbadians
Spanish American Indians
2.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
24.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Barbadian vs Spanish American Indian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,290,556 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.436 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,148,341 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.308 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 22.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Barbadian | Spanish American Indian |
Minimum | 0.47% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 10.5% | 8.6% |
Range | 10.0% | 7.1% |
Mean | 3.2% | 3.9% |
Median | 2.6% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 4.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.91% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 1.7% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Barbadians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Immigrants from West Indies (2.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Ecuadorian (2.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from India (2.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Sierra Leonean (2.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.5%, a difference of 0.85%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
British West Indians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Dominicans | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Thais | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Ghanaians | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are South African (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Europe (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Macedonian (3.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Korean (3.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (3.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.1% |
Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.1% |
Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.1% |
South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |