Armenian vs Immigrants from Ghana Male Disability
COMPARE
Armenian
Immigrants from Ghana
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Armenians
Immigrants from Ghana
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
90.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Immigrants from Ghana Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,935,908 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,919,905 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.17%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Armenian | Immigrants from Ghana |
| Minimum | 5.9% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 39.5% | 27.2% |
| Range | 33.7% | 26.2% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 10.8% |
| Median | 10.9% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Armenians and Immigrants from Ghana by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Cuba (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Eastern European (10.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.9%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), South American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 93.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 93.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Ghanaians | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |