Alaska Native vs Immigrants from Western Africa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Alaska Native
Immigrants from Western Africa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Alaska Natives
Immigrants from Western Africa
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
29.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
33.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaska Native vs Immigrants from Western Africa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,753,099 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,681,039 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.21%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaska Native | Immigrants from Western Africa |
Minimum | 1.4% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 15.1% | 19.4% |
Range | 13.8% | 17.2% |
Mean | 6.5% | 6.8% |
Median | 6.5% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Alaska Natives and Immigrants from Western Africa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Africa are Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.040%), British (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Carpatho Rusyn (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |