Afghan vs Immigrants from Japan Disability
COMPARE
Afghan
Immigrants from Japan
Disability
Disability Comparison
Afghans
Immigrants from Japan
10.8%
DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Immigrants from Japan Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,869,641 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,149,948 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.40%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Afghan | Immigrants from Japan |
| Minimum | 5.6% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 22.3% | 51.5% |
| Range | 16.8% | 49.5% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 13.9% |
| Median | 10.4% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Afghans and Immigrants from Japan by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Cambodian (10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Mongolian (10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Australia (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Nepal (10.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Israeli (10.8%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Israeli (10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Nepal (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Australia (10.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Cambodian (10.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Mongolian (10.8%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Cambodians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Israelis | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Soviet Union | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Vietnamese | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Peruvians | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.9% |