Swedish vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Swedish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Swedes

Czechs

Excellent
Excellent
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Swedish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,603,326 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 35.3 Czechs.
Swedish Integration in Czech Communities

Swedish vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $51,421, a difference of 3.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,377 compared to $103,507, a difference of 2.8%), and median household income ($88,524 compared to $86,164, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 0.84%), median female earnings ($39,421 compared to $38,992, a difference of 1.1%), and median earnings ($47,851 compared to $47,221, a difference of 1.3%).
Swedish vs Czech Income
Income MetricSwedishCzech
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,750
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,499
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,524
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,851
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,445
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,421
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,986
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,136
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,377
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,736
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.4%
Tragic
29.2%

Swedish vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 4.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.25%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Swedish vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricSwedishCzech
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.4%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.2%

Swedish vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.78%).
Swedish vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSwedishCzech
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%

Swedish vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 0.38%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
Swedish vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSwedishCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
44.1%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.8%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Exceptional
83.9%

Swedish vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Czech communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.040%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and currently married (50.0% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
Swedish vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSwedishCzech
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.7%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.0%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Excellent
30.5%

Swedish vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Czech communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Swedish vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSwedishCzech
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.8%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.4%

Swedish vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.1%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%).
Swedish vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricSwedishCzech
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.7%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.8%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.7%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
39.1%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Good
15.2%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Good
1.9%

Swedish vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.0%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
Swedish vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricSwedishCzech
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%