Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,514,159 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Soviet Union communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Soviet Union within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Soviet Union corresponds to an increase of 57.8 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 12.6%), median female earnings ($46,556 compared to $43,571, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,848 compared to $66,376, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,008 compared to $111,914, a difference of 0.080%), median household income ($95,098 compared to $95,319, a difference of 0.23%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,457 compared to $106,888, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 25.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.4%), and receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.050%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 26.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.50%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.3%), births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.89%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (60.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 47.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.7% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.7% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 18.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 30.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.8%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and 11th grade (93.7% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 26.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.18%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.2%).