Nicaraguan vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,413,464 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.051% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to a decrease of 51.3 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,751 compared to $81,341, a difference of 7.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,554 compared to $86,573, a difference of 6.9%), and median male earnings ($49,215 compared to $46,244, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,474 compared to $53,950, a difference of 0.97%), householder income under 25 years ($53,275 compared to $51,447, a difference of 3.5%), and median female earnings ($36,904 compared to $35,444, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (18.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 20.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 18.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 19.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.4%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.41, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 15.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 21.6%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and associate's degree (41.5% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.0% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.65%), 1st grade (97.0% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.6%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.8%).