Laotian vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison

COMPARE

Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrants from the Azores
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Laotians

Immigrants from the Azores

Good
Poor
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,552
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
302nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from the Azores Integration in Laotian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,026,158 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.940. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.128% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 127.6 Immigrants from the Azores.
Laotian Integration in Immigrants from the Azores Communities

Laotian vs Immigrants from the Azores Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $52,121, a difference of 27.2%), per capita income ($47,041 compared to $39,608, a difference of 18.8%), and median family income ($112,859 compared to $95,402, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $52,621, a difference of 3.3%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $38,573, a difference of 9.2%).
Laotian vs Immigrants from the Azores Income
Income MetricLaotianImmigrants from the Azores
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,041
Tragic
$39,608
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,859
Tragic
$95,402
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,990
Tragic
$80,357
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,343
Fair
$45,812
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,351
Fair
$53,503
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,133
Tragic
$38,573
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,369
Good
$52,621
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,993
Fair
$92,322
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,051
Tragic
$94,138
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,306
Tragic
$52,121
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Tragic
27.2%

Laotian vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 64.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 32.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.8%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and female poverty (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 13.1%).
Laotian vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty
Poverty MetricLaotianImmigrants from the Azores
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
15.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
18.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.0%
Tragic
32.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
15.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
16.4%

Laotian vs Immigrants from the Azores Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 41.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.3%).
Laotian vs Immigrants from the Azores Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLaotianImmigrants from the Azores
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%

Laotian vs Immigrants from the Azores Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 19.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
Laotian vs Immigrants from the Azores Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLaotianImmigrants from the Azores
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
63.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Tragic
77.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
41.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
80.1%

Laotian vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 39.0%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 29.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.20%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.5%).
Laotian vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLaotianImmigrants from the Azores
Family Households
Exceptional
65.8%
Exceptional
65.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
45.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
39.6%

Laotian vs Immigrants from the Azores Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.69%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Laotian vs Immigrants from the Azores Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLaotianImmigrants from the Azores
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.1%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Excellent
56.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.5%

Laotian vs Immigrants from the Azores Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 85.5%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 70.5%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 66.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.86%).
Laotian vs Immigrants from the Azores Education Level
Education Level MetricLaotianImmigrants from the Azores
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.1%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Tragic
95.1%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
94.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
93.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
92.5%
9th Grade
Fair
94.6%
Tragic
90.8%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
89.0%
11th Grade
Average
92.6%
Tragic
87.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
85.3%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
82.8%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Tragic
78.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Tragic
54.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.8%
Tragic
48.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.9%
Tragic
35.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.0%
Tragic
27.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
10.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Laotian vs Immigrants from the Azores Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 82.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.6%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 16.3%).
Laotian vs Immigrants from the Azores Disability
Disability MetricLaotianImmigrants from the Azores
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
26.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
50.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%