Immigrants from Sweden vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,188,577 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.838. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.250% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 250.1 Dutch West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $35,922, a difference of 54.7%), median family income ($122,765 compared to $81,852, a difference of 50.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,318 compared to $79,171, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $45,816, a difference of 17.0%), and median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $34,106, a difference of 31.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 54.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.3% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 52.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 16.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 44.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 34.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 35.4%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 34.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (62.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.27%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 116.3%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 115.1%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 90.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 80.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 59.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.2%).