Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Indonesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,513,426 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.841. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.857% in Immigrants from Indonesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 857.2 Immigrants from Indonesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $107,627, a difference of 10.8%), median household income ($88,388 compared to $97,297, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $113,519, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 1.4%), per capita income ($46,213 compared to $48,195, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $55,521, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 16.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 3.0%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and male poverty (11.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 12.6%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.48%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.98%), and family households (64.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.5%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.0%), 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.61%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.71%).