Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ute Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Ute

Fair
Fair
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ute Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,384,312 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Ute.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Ute Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ute Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 21.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $83,937, a difference of 8.9%), and median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $34,960, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $49,997, a difference of 2.6%), median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $48,899, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $82,166, a difference of 5.6%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ute Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarUte
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Tragic
$36,651
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Tragic
$87,596
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Tragic
$72,402
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Tragic
$41,051
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Tragic
$48,899
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Tragic
$34,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Tragic
$49,997
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Tragic
$82,166
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Tragic
$83,937
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Tragic
$52,949
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Tragic
27.8%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ute Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (22.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 25.9%), male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 24.7%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ute Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarUte
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
16.9%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
16.2%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
25.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
17.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
15.7%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
35.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
14.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ute Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 38.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.3%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ute Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarUte
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ute Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 5.3%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ute Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarUte
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
60.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
76.6%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ute Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.3%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.49, a difference of 6.1%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 0.39%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.79%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ute Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarUte
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Tragic
43.9%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Poor
33.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ute Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 40.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.3%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ute Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarUte
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ute Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (88.9% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.19%), high school diploma (86.7% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and 11th grade (90.4% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.73%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ute Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarUte
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Fair
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
81.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
53.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ute Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 31.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.11%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.55%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Ute Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarUte
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.86%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Average
2.5%