Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,655,692 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.227% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 226.5 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $53,722, a difference of 10.4%), per capita income ($37,699 compared to $41,195, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,355 compared to $89,673, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.85%), householder income over 65 years ($53,232 compared to $54,030, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,764 compared to $91,462, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 37.6%), single father poverty (21.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 33.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 15.5%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.3% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.16%), family households (65.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 78.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 52.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 13.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 42.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 9.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 5th grade (95.7% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and 3rd grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.5%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.5%).