Asian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison
COMPARE
Asian
Tohono O'odham
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Asians
Tohono O'odham
8,712
SOCIAL INDEX
84.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
56th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tohono O'odham Integration in Asian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,185,388 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.342. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Tohono O'odham.
Asian vs Tohono O'odham Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($119,955 compared to $72,193, a difference of 66.2%), per capita income ($50,057 compared to $30,256, a difference of 65.4%), and median household income ($101,681 compared to $61,663, a difference of 64.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 21.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $45,248, a difference of 26.0%), and median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $33,205, a difference of 34.3%).
Income Metric | Asian | Tohono O'odham |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,057 | Tragic $30,256 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $119,955 | Tragic $72,193 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $101,681 | Tragic $61,663 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,690 | Tragic $36,349 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,827 | Tragic $39,543 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,586 | Tragic $33,205 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,003 | Tragic $45,248 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $112,666 | Tragic $69,068 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $118,426 | Tragic $73,774 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $68,822 | Tragic $49,121 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.9% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Asian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 163.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 140.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 135.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 51.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 59.4%), and single mother poverty (26.0% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 65.8%).
Poverty Metric | Asian | Tohono O'odham |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 24.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 20.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.2% | Tragic 31.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 24.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.0% | Tragic 29.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 31.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 31.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.7% | Tragic 31.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 34.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.0% | Tragic 43.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 11.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Tragic 20.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 19.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 21.5% |
Asian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 99.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 97.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 92.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 20.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Asian | Tohono O'odham |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 10.2% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 7.7% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 22.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 10.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.9% |
Asian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Asian | Tohono O'odham |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 57.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Tragic 68.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 75.1% |
Asian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 86.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 82.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.94%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.53, a difference of 7.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Asian | Tohono O'odham |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.1% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 37.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.28 | Exceptional 3.53 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 36.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.6% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.8% | Tragic 49.8% |
Asian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 74.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Asian | Tohono O'odham |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 84.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.0% | Tragic 50.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.8% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Excellent 6.6% |
Asian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 93.6%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 90.0%), and bachelor's degree (44.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 81.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.050%), 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and 4th grade (97.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.18%).
Education Level Metric | Asian | Tohono O'odham |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Tragic 90.1% |
11th Grade | Average 92.5% | Tragic 87.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.4% | Tragic 84.7% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.4% | Tragic 82.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.7% | Tragic 77.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.4% | Tragic 52.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 47.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.1% | Tragic 31.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.4% | Tragic 24.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.4% | Tragic 9.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Asian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 101.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 78.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.0%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.1%).
Disability Metric | Asian | Tohono O'odham |
Disability | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 2.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.4% | Tragic 36.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.9% | Tragic 56.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 3.1% |