African vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 353,184,060 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Finns within African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Africans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Africans corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between African and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 24.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,986 compared to $94,610, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,925 compared to $99,904, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,530 compared to $38,173, a difference of 4.5%), median earnings ($41,955 compared to $45,940, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,838 compared to $51,827, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between African and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 52.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 49.9%), and receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.1%), single male poverty (14.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between African and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 32.2%), female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.6%), and unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between African and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.5% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between African and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.1%), births to unmarried women (39.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (62.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between African and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 60.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between African and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.4%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.79%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between African and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.0%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.31%), disability (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (13.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.8%).