Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Health Technologists
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Kentucky
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Mcroberts57.4%4.8%(+52.6)#14.3%(+53.1)#26
2.Cawood32.4%4.8%(+27.6)#24.3%(+28.1)#127
3.Jeff31.9%4.8%(+27.1)#34.3%(+27.6)#136
4.Spottsville30.4%4.8%(+25.5)#44.3%(+26.1)#152
5.Cleaton28.3%4.8%(+23.5)#54.3%(+24.0)#177
6.Mockingbird Valley27.6%4.8%(+22.7)#64.3%(+23.3)#182
7.Hazard25.7%4.8%(+20.8)#74.3%(+21.4)#210
8.Mount Olivet24.5%4.8%(+19.6)#84.3%(+20.2)#229
9.Glenview24.4%4.8%(+19.5)#94.3%(+20.1)#231
10.Marrowbone22.0%4.8%(+17.2)#104.3%(+17.7)#296
11.Maryhill Estates21.5%4.8%(+16.7)#114.3%(+17.2)#308
12.Knottsville21.1%4.8%(+16.3)#124.3%(+16.8)#319
13.Seneca Gardens19.2%4.8%(+14.3)#134.3%(+14.9)#406
14.Symsonia18.7%4.8%(+13.9)#144.3%(+14.4)#431
15.Fairview18.5%4.8%(+13.7)#154.3%(+14.2)#448
16.Murray Hill18.0%4.8%(+13.2)#164.3%(+13.8)#468
17.Virgie17.7%4.8%(+12.9)#174.3%(+13.4)#482
18.Norbourne Estates17.5%4.8%(+12.7)#184.3%(+13.2)#489
19.Strathmoor Manor16.9%4.8%(+12.1)#194.3%(+12.6)#525
20.Northfield16.4%4.8%(+11.6)#204.3%(+12.1)#563
21.Pryorsburg16.3%4.8%(+11.4)#214.3%(+12.0)#580
22.Manitou16.2%4.8%(+11.4)#224.3%(+11.9)#587
23.Raceland15.4%4.8%(+10.6)#234.3%(+11.1)#644
24.Rosine15.1%4.8%(+10.3)#244.3%(+10.8)#678
25.Whitesburg14.9%4.8%(+10.1)#254.3%(+10.6)#699
26.Thornhill14.9%4.8%(+10.1)#264.3%(+10.6)#700
27.Farmington14.9%4.8%(+10.1)#274.3%(+10.6)#701
28.Belfry14.7%4.8%(+9.83)#284.3%(+10.4)#727
29.South Williamson14.4%4.8%(+9.59)#294.3%(+10.1)#761
30.Rabbit Hash14.1%4.8%(+9.28)#304.3%(+9.83)#801
31.Hodgenville13.7%4.8%(+8.87)#314.3%(+9.43)#858
32.Strathmoor Village13.3%4.8%(+8.49)#324.3%(+9.05)#924
33.Audubon Park13.3%4.8%(+8.44)#334.3%(+9.00)#934
34.St Mary13.2%4.8%(+8.32)#344.3%(+8.87)#947
35.Anchorage12.8%4.8%(+7.95)#354.3%(+8.50)#1,020
36.Greenville12.4%4.8%(+7.54)#364.3%(+8.10)#1,105
37.Bellewood12.2%4.8%(+7.35)#374.3%(+7.91)#1,137
38.Norwood12.2%4.8%(+7.34)#384.3%(+7.90)#1,144
39.Prospect11.8%4.8%(+6.97)#394.3%(+7.53)#1,235
40.Kingsley11.8%4.8%(+6.92)#404.3%(+7.48)#1,244
41.Cambridge11.7%4.8%(+6.87)#414.3%(+7.43)#1,266
42.Windy Hills11.6%4.8%(+6.75)#424.3%(+7.30)#1,291
43.Druid Hills11.6%4.8%(+6.72)#434.3%(+7.27)#1,300
44.Broeck Pointe11.5%4.8%(+6.61)#444.3%(+7.16)#1,336
45.Brownsboro Farm11.4%4.8%(+6.58)#454.3%(+7.13)#1,347
46.Mortons Gap11.3%4.8%(+6.47)#464.3%(+7.03)#1,373
47.Bancroft11.3%4.8%(+6.43)#474.3%(+6.98)#1,385
48.Bellefonte11.2%4.8%(+6.38)#484.3%(+6.93)#1,399
49.Cecilia11.2%4.8%(+6.34)#494.3%(+6.90)#1,406
50.Spring Valley11.1%4.8%(+6.30)#504.3%(+6.85)#1,414
51.Pikeville11.1%4.8%(+6.22)#514.3%(+6.78)#1,443
52.Mayking10.9%4.8%(+6.03)#524.3%(+6.58)#1,492
53.Barbourville10.7%4.8%(+5.88)#534.3%(+6.44)#1,531
54.Brownsboro Village10.7%4.8%(+5.87)#544.3%(+6.43)#1,534
55.Plano10.6%4.8%(+5.75)#554.3%(+6.31)#1,574
56.St Matthews10.4%4.8%(+5.59)#564.3%(+6.14)#1,630
57.Alexandria10.4%4.8%(+5.51)#574.3%(+6.07)#1,658
58.Hurstbourne10.2%4.8%(+5.40)#584.3%(+5.95)#1,706
59.Bloomfield10.2%4.8%(+5.35)#594.3%(+5.91)#1,720
60.Jenkins10.2%4.8%(+5.32)#604.3%(+5.87)#1,732
61.Belleview10.0%4.8%(+5.16)#614.3%(+5.71)#1,788
62.Elkhorn City9.9%4.8%(+5.10)#624.3%(+5.65)#1,815
63.South Shore9.9%4.8%(+5.07)#634.3%(+5.63)#1,826
64.Elk Creek9.9%4.8%(+5.04)#644.3%(+5.60)#1,842
65.Ten Broeck9.7%4.8%(+4.84)#654.3%(+5.39)#1,926
66.Upton9.6%4.8%(+4.73)#664.3%(+5.28)#1,978
67.Hills And Dales9.5%4.8%(+4.68)#674.3%(+5.24)#2,001
68.Harlan9.4%4.8%(+4.56)#684.3%(+5.12)#2,059
69.Old Brownsboro Place9.2%4.8%(+4.41)#694.3%(+4.96)#2,136
70.Paintsville9.2%4.8%(+4.37)#704.3%(+4.92)#2,159
71.Sebree9.2%4.8%(+4.34)#714.3%(+4.89)#2,174
72.Fairfield9.1%4.8%(+4.25)#724.3%(+4.80)#2,228
73.Graymoor Devondale9.1%4.8%(+4.24)#734.3%(+4.79)#2,248
74.Simpsonville9.1%4.8%(+4.22)#744.3%(+4.78)#2,253
75.Sacramento9.0%4.8%(+4.18)#754.3%(+4.74)#2,274
76.Manor Creek8.9%4.8%(+4.08)#764.3%(+4.63)#2,335
77.Summersville8.9%4.8%(+4.06)#774.3%(+4.62)#2,347
78.Indian Hills8.9%4.8%(+4.04)#784.3%(+4.60)#2,365
79.Russell8.8%4.8%(+3.99)#794.3%(+4.54)#2,394
80.Beechmont8.8%4.8%(+3.92)#804.3%(+4.47)#2,432
81.Sycamore8.7%4.8%(+3.91)#814.3%(+4.46)#2,443
82.Union8.7%4.8%(+3.91)#824.3%(+4.46)#2,444
83.Watterson Park8.7%4.8%(+3.90)#834.3%(+4.46)#2,451
84.Wurtland8.7%4.8%(+3.87)#844.3%(+4.42)#2,473
85.Coal Run Village8.7%4.8%(+3.83)#854.3%(+4.38)#2,506
86.Morganfield8.5%4.8%(+3.66)#864.3%(+4.21)#2,603
87.Irvine8.5%4.8%(+3.64)#874.3%(+4.19)#2,618
88.Coldstream8.5%4.8%(+3.61)#884.3%(+4.17)#2,637
89.Woodland Hills8.4%4.8%(+3.59)#894.3%(+4.14)#2,655
90.Douglass Hills8.4%4.8%(+3.53)#904.3%(+4.09)#2,688
91.Glenview Hills8.2%4.8%(+3.40)#914.3%(+3.96)#2,773
92.Clarkson8.1%4.8%(+3.30)#924.3%(+3.86)#2,862
93.Madisonville8.1%4.8%(+3.21)#934.3%(+3.77)#2,932
94.Central City7.9%4.8%(+3.09)#944.3%(+3.65)#3,036
95.Smithland7.8%4.8%(+2.99)#954.3%(+3.54)#3,126
96.Richlawn7.7%4.8%(+2.89)#964.3%(+3.44)#3,215
97.Newport7.7%4.8%(+2.88)#974.3%(+3.44)#3,219
98.Hanson7.7%4.8%(+2.87)#984.3%(+3.43)#3,225
99.Liberty7.7%4.8%(+2.83)#994.3%(+3.38)#3,281
100.Jamestown7.6%4.8%(+2.80)#1004.3%(+3.35)#3,318

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky are:
#1
57.4%
#2
32.4%
#3
31.9%
#4
30.4%
#5
28.3%
#6
27.6%
#7
25.7%
#8
24.5%
#9
24.4%
#10
22.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky?
McRoberts has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky with 57.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the State of Kentucky?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky is 4.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the United States is 4.3%.