Yaqui vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yaqui
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yaqui

Luxembourgers

Poor
Excellent
1,558
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
299th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Yaqui Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,860,789 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Yaqui communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yaqui within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.143% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yaqui corresponds to an increase of 143.5 Luxembourgers.
Yaqui Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Yaqui vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,112 compared to $45,663, a difference of 26.5%), median family income ($87,289 compared to $106,183, a difference of 21.6%), and median male earnings ($46,777 compared to $56,300, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,300 compared to $50,379, a difference of 4.3%), householder income over 65 years ($56,417 compared to $60,967, a difference of 8.1%), and wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 14.1%).
Yaqui vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricYaquiLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,112
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,289
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,596
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,647
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,777
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,943
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,300
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,656
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,914
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,417
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.0%
Tragic
27.4%

Yaqui vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 63.0%), family poverty (11.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 57.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.8%), single male poverty (14.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 9.8%).
Yaqui vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricYaquiLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.3%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
24.9%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.1%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
9.1%

Yaqui vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 36.8%), unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 33.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.0%).
Yaqui vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYaquiLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.0%

Yaqui vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.2% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.0% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 5.8%).
Yaqui vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYaquiLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.0%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.5%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.9%
Exceptional
85.0%

Yaqui vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.0%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.8%), and births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.7%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.10, a difference of 7.2%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.8%).
Yaqui vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYaquiLuxembourger
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.1%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.5%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.8%
Exceptional
29.4%

Yaqui vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 39.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 0.40%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.6% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 9.7%).
Yaqui vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYaquiLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.9%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Excellent
6.6%

Yaqui vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.0%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 46.3%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.96%).
Yaqui vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricYaquiLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.6%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.9%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.6%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.0%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
1.9%

Yaqui vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 27.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 8.9%).
Yaqui vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricYaquiLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%