Yakama vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Yakama
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Yakama
Laotians
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Yakama Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,734,664 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.867. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.106% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to an increase of 106.2 Laotians.
Yakama vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,009 compared to $47,041, a difference of 42.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,226 compared to $104,993, a difference of 37.7%), and median family income ($83,932 compared to $112,859, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $54,369, a difference of 0.090%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,234 compared to $66,306, a difference of 17.9%).
Income Metric | Yakama | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $33,009 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $83,932 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,225 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,107 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,002 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,354 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,321 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $76,226 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,992 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,234 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.7% | Poor 26.4% |
Yakama vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 114.9%), married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 90.1%), and family poverty (13.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 20.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 31.7%), and single male poverty (15.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 34.4%).
Poverty Metric | Yakama | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.6% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 28.3% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.8% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 18.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Yakama vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 123.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 86.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 86.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Yakama | Laotian |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.3% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 7.9% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.7% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 15.6% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.5% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.8% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 8.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.7% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Yakama vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Yakama | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.8% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.9% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.1% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.6% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.1% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.0% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Good 82.9% |
Yakama vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 87.7%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 44.4%), and births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (69.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.4%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.26, a difference of 5.8%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 7.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Yakama | Laotian |
Family Households | Exceptional 69.3% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.8% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.2% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.45 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.0% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.3% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Yakama vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 75.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 44.1%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 37.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Yakama | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 31.0% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 12.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Yakama vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 79.9%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 79.8%), and bachelor's degree (24.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Yakama | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.6% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.6% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 86.9% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 85.0% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 82.5% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 80.0% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 74.5% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.6% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 46.2% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 32.3% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Yakama vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 44.2%), hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.2%).
Disability Metric | Yakama | Laotian |
Disability | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.00% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 29.6% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.3% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.9% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Excellent 2.4% |